Hendon

Hendon v. California State Senate

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20223:21-cv-00505California863 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAWN HENDON, Case No.: 21cv505-RSH-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDERNING DENYING IN

v. PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF

CALIFORNIA STATE SENATE, et

DISCOVERY DEADLINE

al., 15 Defendants. 16 This case involves allegations of employment discrimination. (ECF No. 10 [Am. Compl.]). Plaintiff currently seeks an extension of time to conduct discovery. (ECF No. 20). In her ex parte motion, Plaintiff represents that Defendants would not stipulate to her requested extension, but she argues that good cause for modifying the Scheduling Order is presented. The Court disagrees. Background The Court entered a Scheduling Order in this case on May 9, 2022. (ECF No. 17). The parties were given five months to conduct discovery. (Id.) All discovery is set to conclude in three weeks, on October 11, 2022, and Plaintiff cites the Court’s general admonition, which was given to the parties in this case, that discovery…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.