Chaudry

Chaudry v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20223:21-cv-01847California5,811 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 A. WAHEED CHAUDRY, Case No.: 21cv1847-GPC(AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITH

PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; TODD

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

MCCRACKEN; LUZETTE WARNER;

ELIZABETH MILLER; ALEJANDRO

[Dkt. Nos. 8, 9, 10.] CHAVIRA, AND Does 1 through 25, Defendant. 18 Defendants Todd McCracken and Luzette Werner (erroneously sued as Luzette Warner) (“Assessor Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(1) & 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 8.) Defendants Alejandro Chavira and Elizabeth Miller (“AAB Defendants”) also filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) & 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 10.) Lastly, Defendant County of San Diego (“County”) filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) & 12(b)(6) and joined in Defendants Todd McCracken and Luzette Werner’s motion to dismiss. (Dkt. 26 27 28 No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.