Stroud

Stroud v. Gore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20223:18-cv-00515-JLS-MDDCalifornia3,705 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WILLARD RICHARD STROUD, JR., Case No.: 18-CV-515 JLS (MDD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

(ECF No. 109) SHERIFF WILLIAM D. GORE, et al., Defendants.

Presently before the Court is Defendants Sergeant Paul Michalke, Detective Benjamin Shea, and Detective Jesus Lizarraga’s (collectively, the “Deputy Defendants”) Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (“Mot.,” ECF No. 109). Plaintiff Willard Richard Stroud, Jr., appearing pro se, did not file an opposition to the instant motion; however, he did oppose the Deputy Defendants’ original Motion for Summary Judgment (“MSJ,” ECF No. 86) and argued against the Court granting summary judgment in favor of the Deputy Defendants on his false arrest claim. See generally ECF No. 101 (“Opp’n”). The Court vacated the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.