Thomas-Weisner

Thomas-Weisner v. Gipson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20223:19-cv-01999California462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONQUIL THOMAS-WEISNER, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01999-JAH-BGS Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

CONNIE GIPSON, et al., Defendants. (ECF No. 38). On July 14, 2022, the Court issued an order adopting Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal’s report and recommendation and granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss without leave to amend. (ECF No. 36). On August 18, 2022, Plaintiff Jonquil Thomas-Weisner (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order. (ECF No. 38). Thereafter, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal from the order adopting the report and recommendation and granting the motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 40). “The filing of a notice of appeal generally divests the district court of jurisdiction over the matters appealed.” Davis v. United States, 667 F. 822, 824 (9th Cir. 1982). A notice of appeal does not divest the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.