Evers

Evers v. La-Z-Boy Incoroprated

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20223:22-cv-00578California4,385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DUSTIN EVERS, as an individual and on Case No.: 22cv578-LL-BLM behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO REMAND v. 14 [ECF No. 6] LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED, a 15 Michigan corporation; LZB RETAIL,

INC., a Michigan corporation; LA-Z-BOY FURNITURE GALLERIES; and DOES 1 17 through 50, inclusive, 18 Defendants.

20 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Dustin Evers’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to 21 Remand. ECF No. 6. For the reasons set forth below, and for some of the same reasons set 22 forth in the Court’s remand of Plaintiff’s separate lawsuit against Defendants, the Court 23 GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand and REMANDS this matter to San Diego County 24 Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 I. BACKGROUND A. The Previously Filed Action (Evers I) On November 12, 2021, Plaintiff filed a putative class action in the San Diego County Superior Court against Defendant La-Z-Boy Incorporated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.