Ajaelo

Ajaelo v. Carrillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20223:20-cv-02191California1,306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIDEOFOR AJAELO, Case No.: 20-cv-2191-WQH-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO COMPEL

DISCOVERY

J. CARRILLO,

Defendant. [DKT. NO. 32] 16 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery seeking Defendant’s further responses to two Requests for Admission. Dkt. No. 32. Defendant opposes, claiming he “fully responded” to the requests. Dkt. No. 34 at 1.2 Having considered the pleadings, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel.

23 1 When referencing page numbers for documents filed with the Court, the Court’s citation 24 refers to the page numbers assigned by the Court’s CM-ECF system. 25 Defendant also opposes Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel due to Plaintiff’s allegedly 26 inadequate meet and confer efforts. Dkt. No. 34 at 2–3. The Court, however, waives the meet and confer requirements for Plaintiff, who is pro se and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.