City of Birmingham Relief and Retirement System v. Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20223:21-cv-00762California9,151 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 CITY OF BIRMINGHAM RELIEF Case No. 3:21-cv-00762-WQH-NLS AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM; and

OHIO CARPENTERS’ PENSION

FUND, Individually and On Behalf of ORDER All Others Similarly Situated, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v.

ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS,

INC.; STEPHEN R. DAVIS; and

SRDJAN (SERGE) R. STANKOVIC,

18 Defendants. 19 HAYES, Judge: The matter before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss the FAC filed by Defendants Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Stephen R. Davis, and Srdjan (Serge) R. Stankovic. (ECF No. 53.) I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On April 19, 2021, Denise Marechal initiated this action by filing a Class Action Complaint. (ECF No. 1.) On September 29, 2021, the Court issued an Order 27 appointing City of Birmingham Relief and Retirement System (“Birmingham”) as 28 Lead Plaintiff. (ECF No. 38.) On December 10, 2021, Birmingham and additional Plaintiff Ohio Carpenters’ Pension Fund (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed an Amended Class Action Complaint (the “FAC”). (ECF No. 45.) The FAC alleges that Defendants violated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.