Ryan

Ryan v. County of Imperial

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20223:21-cv-01076California3,033 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Ryan et al, Case No.: 21cv1076-JO-KSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MEDIA

v. DEFENDANTS’ ANTI-SLAPP

MOTION TO STRIKE

County of Imperial et al, Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs Gilda and Joseph Ryan filed a wide-ranging complaint alleging state and federal claims against Defendants Yuma Sun Incorporated, Uriel Avendano, and Lisa Reilly (collectively, “Media Defendants”) as well as numerous other defendants. Media Defendants filed a motion to strike Plaintiffs’ state law claims for violations of the Unruh Act and defamation pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute. Dkt. 87. For the reasons 25

27 1 Media Defendants concurrently filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Dkt. 88. The Court 28 discussed below, Media Defendants’ motion to strike is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs’ state law claims. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are residents of Imperial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.