Frost
Frost v. County of San Diego
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20223:21-cv-01903California7,305 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 KRISTINA FROST, Case No.: 21cv01903-L-AGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND
v. GRANTING IN PART
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, WILLIAM
DISMISS AND DENYING
GORE, MASON CASSIDY, UNKNOWN
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
SAN DIEGO SHERIFF’S
STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL,
Defendants. [ECF No. 11]
Pending before the Court are Defendants’ motion to dismiss and motion to strike Plaintiff’s Complaint. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff opposed the motion, (ECF No. 12), and Defendants replied, (ECF No. 13). The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d.1). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied in part and granted in part with leave to amend. Defendants’ motion to strike is denied. I. BACKGROUND According to the allegations in the Complaint (ECF No. 1), on…