Frost

Frost v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20223:21-cv-01903California7,305 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 KRISTINA FROST, Case No.: 21cv01903-L-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND

v. GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, WILLIAM

DISMISS AND DENYING

GORE, MASON CASSIDY, UNKNOWN

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

SAN DIEGO SHERIFF’S

STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL,

Defendants. [ECF No. 11]

Pending before the Court are Defendants’ motion to dismiss and motion to strike Plaintiff’s Complaint. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff opposed the motion, (ECF No. 12), and Defendants replied, (ECF No. 13). The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d.1). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied in part and granted in part with leave to amend. Defendants’ motion to strike is denied. I. BACKGROUND According to the allegations in the Complaint (ECF No. 1), on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.