Erhart
Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 CHARLES MATTHEW ERHART, Case No. 15-cv-02287-BAS-NLS consolidated with Plaintiff, 15-cv-02353-BAS-NLS
ORDER ENTERING
v. JUDGMENT
BOFI FEDERAL BANK,
Defendant.
BOFI FEDERAL BANK,
17 Plaintiff, 18 v.
CHARLES MATTHEW ERHART,
20 Defendant. 21 22 The Court circulated a Proposed Judgment awarding Erhart damages and post- judgment interest. (ECF No. 376.) Many of the parties’ suggested changes are minor. The Court will incorporate some of them and direct the Clerk to enter the Judgment. Erhart also requested the Court add pre-judgment interest to the Judgment. |{and the Court would need to determine when prejudgment interest began to run and ||specify any interest rate(s). Erhart did not propose additional language for the Judgment. And Bofl should have the opportunity to respond to Erhart’s request. Therefore, if Erhart seeks prejudgment interest, the Court requests that he file…