Hammett

Hammett v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20223:19-cv-00605California6,007 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURA LYNN HAMMETT, Case No.: 19cv605-LL-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING THIRD

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

DENYING MOTION TO

MARY E. SHERMAN, et al.

WITHDRAW AMENDED

Defendants. COMPLAINT

16 [ECF Nos. 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 257, 258] 18 This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (1) the Motions to Dismiss filed by (a) Defendants Mary E. Sherman and Jeffrey M. Sherman in all capacities (“the Sherman Defendants”) (“Sherman Motion”) [ECF No. 239]; (b) Defendant Diane Dennis (“Dennis Motion”) [ECF No. 240]; (c) Defendants Linda R. Kramer and Erik Von Pressintin Hunsaker in all capacities (“Kramer Motion”) [ECF No. 241]; and (d) Defendant Silver Strand Plaza, LLC (“SSP”) (“SSP Motion”) [ECF No. 242]; (2) Plaintiff Laura Lynn Hammett’s Motion to Withdraw Third Amended Complaint (“Motion to Withdraw”) [ECF No. 257]; and (3) Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.