Hebert

Hebert v. Allied Rubber & Gasket Co., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20223:20-cv-01350California6,795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} LELAND J. HEBERT, Case No.: 20-cv-1350-JO-MDD Plaintitt, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 13 || Vv. MOTION FOR PARTIAL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY Defendant.| JUDGMENT 17 18 19 Plaintiff Leland J. Hebert (“Plaintiff”) brought an action against his former busines: |}partner and employer, Defendant Allied Rubber & Gasket Company (“Defendant”) jjalleging patent infringement, false marking, and unfair competition surrounding ||Defendant’s sale of adjustable wrenches. Plaintiff and Defendant filed cross-motions □□□ ||summary judgment on the patent infringement claim. Dkts. 44, 45. Defendant also filed < ||motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs false marking and unfair competition claims ||Dkt. 45. The Court held oral argument on April 27, 2022. For the reasons discussed below 27 || Plaintiff’s motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.