Lindland

Lindland v. TuSimple, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20223:21-cv-00417California1,117 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN LINDLAND, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00417-RBM-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE MOTIONS TO SEAL

TUSIMPLE, INC., et al., [Docs. 33, 35, 51] Defendants. 16 Currently pending before the Court are: (1) Plaintiff John Lindland’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to file under seal documents in support of Plaintiff’s motion to exclude the testimony of Defendant TuSimple, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) expert witness (Doc. 33); (2) Defendant’s motion to file under seal documents in support of Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 35); and (3) Plaintiff’s motion to file under seal documents in support of Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 51). For the reasons discussed below, all three motions to seal are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I. LEGAL STANDARD “[T]he courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.