Cleveland v. The Behemoth

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20223:19-cv-00672California1,123 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CLEVELAND, an individual, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00672-RBM-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

THE BEHEMOTH’S MOTION IN

THE BEHEMOTH, a California

LIMINE TO EXCLUDE

corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, EXTRANEOUS COMMENTS Defendants. REGARDING RACISM, PUBLIC

PARKING, AND BUILDING

CONDITIONS

18 [Doc. 60] 19 On March 4, 2022, Defendant The Behemoth (“Defendant”) filed a Motion in Limine to Exclude Extraneous Comments Regarding Racism, Public Parking, and Building Conditions (“Motion”). (Doc. 60.) On March 18, 2022, Plaintiff Robert Cleveland (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition to the Motion (“Opposition”). (Doc. 75.) In the Motion, Defendant states that evidence of the aforementioned categories should be excluded from trial because they are irrelevant to Plaintiff’s causes of action, highly prejudicial, and 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.