Cleveland v. The Behemoth

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20223:19-cv-00672California3,865 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CLEVELAND, an individual, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00672-RBM-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

v. THE BEHEMOTH’S MOTION IN

LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE

THE BEHEMOTH, a California

OF PLAINTIFF’S DAMAGES

corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 15 Defendants. 16 [Doc. 57] 17 On March 4, 2022, Defendant The Behemoth (“Defendant”) filed a Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Plaintiff’s Damages (“Motion”). (Doc. 57.) On March 18, 2022, Plaintiff Robert Cleveland (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition to the Motion (“Opposition”). (Doc. 72.) In the Motion, Defendant alleges that Plaintiff has not disclosed his damages in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 26(a)(1)(A)(iii). (Doc. 57 at 2.) Thus, pursuant to Rule 37, Defendant moves to preclude Plaintiff from presenting at trial: “(1) evidence of alleged economic damages, including lost income; (2) emotional distress damages and/or medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.