Cleveland v. The Behemoth
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CLEVELAND, an individual, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00672-RBM-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT
v. THE BEHEMOTH’S MOTION IN
LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
THE BEHEMOTH, a California
OF PLAINTIFF’S DAMAGES
corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 15 Defendants. 16 [Doc. 57] 17 On March 4, 2022, Defendant The Behemoth (“Defendant”) filed a Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Plaintiff’s Damages (“Motion”). (Doc. 57.) On March 18, 2022, Plaintiff Robert Cleveland (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition to the Motion (“Opposition”). (Doc. 72.) In the Motion, Defendant alleges that Plaintiff has not disclosed his damages in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 26(a)(1)(A)(iii). (Doc. 57 at 2.) Thus, pursuant to Rule 37, Defendant moves to preclude Plaintiff from presenting at trial: “(1) evidence of alleged economic damages, including lost income; (2) emotional distress damages and/or medical…