Cleveland v. The Behemoth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CLEVELAND, an individual, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00672-RBM-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

v. THE BEHEMOTH’S MOTION TO

EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF

THE BEHEMOTH, a California

PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT WITNESS,

corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, DR. ELLEN STEIN, PH.D. Defendants.

[Doc. 63] 18 On March 4, 2022, Defendant The Behemoth (“Defendant”) filed a Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff’s Expert Witness, Dr. Ellen Stein, Ph.D. (“Motion”). (Doc. 63.) On March 18, 2022, Plaintiff Robert Cleveland (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition to the Motion (“Opposition”). (Doc. 71.) In the Motion, Defendant argues that “Dr. Stein’s testimony is (1) unreliable as it is not based on technical or other specialized knowledge; and (2) not helpful to the trier of fact.” (Doc. 63–1 at 2.) For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. …