Cleveland v. The Behemoth

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20223:19-cv-00672California1,849 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CLEVELAND, an individual, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00672-RBM-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF

v. ROBERT CLEVELAND’S DAUBERT

MOTION TO EXCLUDE

THE BEHEMOTH, a California

DEFENDANT FROM MAKING USE

corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, OF THE TESTIMONY OF Defendants. DOMINICK ADDARIO, M.D.

17 [Doc. 65] 18 19 On March 4, 2022, Plaintiff Robert Cleveland (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion to Exclude Defendant from Making Use of the Testimony of Dominick Addario, M.D. (“Motion”). (Doc. 65.) On March 18, 2022, Defendant The Behemoth (“Defendant”) filed an opposition to the Motion (“Opposition”). (Doc. 80.) In the Motion, Plaintiff argues Dr. Addario’s testimony would not be helpful to the trier of fact and is irrelevant, unreliable, and inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence (“Rules” or “Rule”). (Doc. 65–1 at 2.) For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.