Cleveland v. The Behemoth
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CLEVELAND, an individual, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00672-RBM-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF
v. ROBERT CLEVELAND’S DAUBERT
MOTION TO EXCLUDE
THE BEHEMOTH, a California
DEFENDANT FROM MAKING USE
corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, OF THE TESTIMONY OF Defendants. DOMINICK ADDARIO, M.D.
17 [Doc. 65] 18 19 On March 4, 2022, Plaintiff Robert Cleveland (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion to Exclude Defendant from Making Use of the Testimony of Dominick Addario, M.D. (“Motion”). (Doc. 65.) On March 18, 2022, Defendant The Behemoth (“Defendant”) filed an opposition to the Motion (“Opposition”). (Doc. 80.) In the Motion, Plaintiff argues Dr. Addario’s testimony would not be helpful to the trier of fact and is irrelevant, unreliable, and inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence (“Rules” or “Rule”). (Doc. 65–1 at 2.) For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED.…