Nguyen

Nguyen v. Tulare County Superior Court Judge

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20223:22-cv-01504California577 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PETER NGUYEN, Case No.: 22-cv-1504-CAB-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE AND

v. DENYING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

TULARE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

AS MOOT

JUDGE,

12 Defendants. [Doc. No. 2] 14 On October 3, 2022, Plaintiff Peter Nguyen filed a complaint that purports to state a claim for “violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983,” but in reality appears to be little more than a misguided appeal of a Tulare County Superior Court’s decision finding him guilty of a vehicular speeding violation. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [Doc. No. 2.] A complaint filed by any person seeking to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) is subject to sua sponte dismissal if it is “(i) frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.