Moody v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RONNIE L. MOODY, GARY T. Case No.: 18cv1110-WQH-AGS
DEANS, BILLY R. WILLIAMS,
11 and DONNEL E. JONES, ORDER 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v.
RODRIGUEZ, J. MCGEE, J.
SALAZAR, D. RAMOS,
ADAMS, J. HERRERA, W.
EDROZO, E. CRUZ, J. DURAN,
AVILA, I. BRAVO, and DOES 1- 50, 18 Defendants. 19 HAYES, Judge: The matter before the Court is the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 90) filed by Defendants McGee, Salazar, Ramos, Edrozo, Cruz, Duran, and Bravo (collectively, “Defendants”).1
25 1 The parties do not assert that any claims against Defendants Rodriguez, Adams, Herrera, or Avila remain to be tried. These claims will be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1 prior to trial. (See March 28, 2022, Order, ECF No. 88 at 2 (“For each claim listed in Section II of the pretrial order, the proposed amended pretrial order shall separately identify as to each Plaintiff the specific Defendant or 28 I. BACKGROUND On May 31, 2018, Plaintiffs Moody, Deans,…