Moody v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20223:18-cv-01110California7,590 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RONNIE L. MOODY, GARY T. Case No.: 18cv1110-WQH-AGS

DEANS, BILLY R. WILLIAMS,

11 and DONNEL E. JONES, ORDER 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v.

RODRIGUEZ, J. MCGEE, J.

SALAZAR, D. RAMOS,

ADAMS, J. HERRERA, W.

EDROZO, E. CRUZ, J. DURAN,

AVILA, I. BRAVO, and DOES 1- 50, 18 Defendants. 19 HAYES, Judge: The matter before the Court is the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 90) filed by Defendants McGee, Salazar, Ramos, Edrozo, Cruz, Duran, and Bravo (collectively, “Defendants”).1

25 1 The parties do not assert that any claims against Defendants Rodriguez, Adams, Herrera, or Avila remain to be tried. These claims will be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1 prior to trial. (See March 28, 2022, Order, ECF No. 88 at 2 (“For each claim listed in Section II of the pretrial order, the proposed amended pretrial order shall separately identify as to each Plaintiff the specific Defendant or 28 I. BACKGROUND On May 31, 2018, Plaintiffs Moody, Deans,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.