Roberts

Roberts v. Milles

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20223:22-cv-00956California310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, Case No.: 22-CV-956 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH

v. PREJUDICE MATT MILLES; CALI OLSON; and US BANK, Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 On August 26, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiff Tina Louise Roberts’s Amended Complaint without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. See ECF No. 6. The Court granted Plaintiff thirty days to file a new amended complaint and warned Plaintiff that failure to do so would result in the Court entering a final Order dismissing the case for failure to state a claim, lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and failure to prosecute. See id. The thirty-day deadline has passed, but Plaintiff has yet to file an amended complaint or otherwise appear in this action. Instead, Plaintiff appears to have initiated another action based on similar, if not identical, claims. || See Roberts v. Olson, No. 3:22-CV-1373 JLS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.