Hurst

Hurst v. Richardson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20223:22-cv-01467California899 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK DORIAN HURST, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01467-GPC-MDD Booking #22722552,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY

FILING FEE REQUIRED

BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR ZACHARY RICHARDSON, San Diego

FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED

Police Officer #1065,

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendant. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)

19 Plaintiff Patrick Dorian Hurst, proceeding pro se and while detained at the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department Las Colinas Detention and Reentry Facility, in Santee, California, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on September 26, 2022. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaintiff claims a San Diego Police Officer violated his constitutional rights during an April 2022 traffic stop that resulted in his arrest. Id. at 2‒5. He seeks injunctive relief preventing further harassment, $200…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.