Douglas

Douglas v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20223:22-cv-00884California3,713 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK C. DOUGLAS, Case No.: 22-CV-00884 JLS (BGS)

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. STAY AND ABEYANCE

RICK HILL and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California, (ECF Nos. 1, 3) 15 Respondents. 16 17 18 Patrick C. Douglas (“Petitioner” or “Douglas”) has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Pet.,” ECF No. 1), as well as a Supplement thereto (“Pet. Supp.,” ECF No. 4). Petitioner also filed a Motion for Stay and Abeyance (“Mot.,” ECF No. 3), and Supplement thereto (“Mot. Supp.,” ECF No. 5). Respondents Rick Hill and Rob Bonta (collectively, “Respondents”) filed an Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 9), and Petitioner filed a Reply to the Opposition (“Reply,” ECF No. 11). Having considered the Petitioner’s Petition and Motion, the parties’ arguments and the law, the Court GRANTS Douglas’s Motion for Stay. / / / / / / BACKGROUND Following a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.