Rosete

Rosete v. California Border Patrol

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20223:22-cv-00089California385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ERNESTO ROSETE, an individual, Case No.: 22-cv-89-GPC(AGH) Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE

A CLAIM AND FOR FAILING TO

CALIFORNIA BORDER PATROL,

PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE

Defendant. WITH COURT ORDER 15 On January 19, 2022, Plaintiff Ernesto Rosete (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a form complaint against an agent of Defendant California Border Patrol. (Dkt. No. 1, Compl.) He also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. No. 2.) On March 9, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and sua sponte dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failing to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 3.) The Court granted him leave to file an amended complaint no later than April 1, 2022. (Id. at 4.) On March 14, 2022, Plaintiff attempted to file a notice of voluntary dismissal but it was rejected because it was lacking a signature. (Dkt. Nos. 4, 5.) Plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.