Horvath

Horvath v. JP Morgan Chase & Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20223:21-cv-01665California4,990 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HELEN L. HORVATH, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01665-BTM-

AGS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

COSTS, EXPENSES, AND

JP MORGAN CHASE &

ATTORNEY’S FEES.

COMPANY,

15 Defendant. [ECF No. 74, 75, and 77]

17 Dr. Helen Horvath (“Plaintiff”), in Propria Persona, has filed motions for costs 18 and fees pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. (ECF Nos. 19 74, 75, 77.) JP Morgan Chase (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. Plaintiff filed a 20 response and a separate “Statement of Facts/Legal Issues”. (ECF Nos. 79 and 21 80.) Although this case is remanded, the Court retains jurisdiction over the 22 collateral issue of costs and attorney’s fees under § 1447(c). The motions have 23 been extensively briefed and oral argument would not add anything or aid the 24 Court in deciding the motions. Therefore, under Civ. L.R. 7.1 (d)(1), the Court has 25 exercised its discretion to decide the motions on the papers without oral argument. 26 For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.