Santana

Santana v. Hemmerling

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20223:21-cv-00406California528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} JOSHUA PAUL SANTANA, Case No.: 21-cv-406-JO-JLB Plaintitt ORDER DISMISSING IFP 13 || V- COMPLAINT WITHOUT || JOHN C. HERMMERLING, CAROL PREJUDICE MENDOZA, and MARA W. ELLIOTT, Defendants. 17 18 On January 28, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed □□ 20 || forma pauperis (“IFP”) and dismissed Plaintiffs original complaint for lack of subjec 21 || matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend 22 || and Plaintiff timely filed his Amended Complaint on February 9; 2022. For the following ||reasons, the Court dismisses the Amended Complaint without prejudice. Upon review of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, the Court finds that Plaintiff stil 25 || fails to set forth a valid claim or plead subject matter jurisdiction. In cases proceeding ir 26 || forma pauperis, the Court is under a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.