Limpin
Limpin v. McSeveney
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELCHOR KARL T. LIMPIN, Case No.: 16-cv-02351-AJB-BLM
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF v. 14 (Doc. No. 58) ROBERT MCSEVENEY, Immigration Judge, et al.,
Defendant. 18 Before the Court is Melchor Karl T. Limpin’s (“Limpin”) motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 60(b)(1) requesting the Court to “reverse its order” striking his motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and to amend his complaint. (Doc. No. 58 at 1.) Limpin contends the Court made a mistake when it struck his filings based on the Ninth Circuit’s decision to affirm the Court’s dismissal of Limpin’s action. (Id.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Limpin’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Limpin filed suit against several federal defendants in their official and individual capacities, seeking relief under Bivens for alleged constitutional violations. (Doc. No. 19.) Because “the United States has…