Limpin

Limpin v. McSeveney

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20223:16-cv-02351California746 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELCHOR KARL T. LIMPIN, Case No.: 16-cv-02351-AJB-BLM

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF v. 14 (Doc. No. 58) ROBERT MCSEVENEY, Immigration Judge, et al.,

Defendant. 18 Before the Court is Melchor Karl T. Limpin’s (“Limpin”) motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 60(b)(1) requesting the Court to “reverse its order” striking his motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and to amend his complaint. (Doc. No. 58 at 1.) Limpin contends the Court made a mistake when it struck his filings based on the Ninth Circuit’s decision to affirm the Court’s dismissal of Limpin’s action. (Id.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Limpin’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Limpin filed suit against several federal defendants in their official and individual capacities, seeking relief under Bivens for alleged constitutional violations. (Doc. No. 19.) Because “the United States has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.