Dupre

Dupre v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20223:22-cv-00169California566 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 8 COLIN DUPRE, Case No.: 22cv169-JO-AGS 9 Plaintiff, 10 v.

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

CITY OF SAN DIEGO; ALPHA;

AND INSTRUCTING THE U.S.

FATHER JOES; MCELROY;

MARSHAL TO SERVE

MOSTELLAR; NISLET; SAYASANE;

14 and DOES 1 through 40, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 In this pro se civil rights action, Plaintiff Colin Dupre filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. 15. For the following reasons, the Court denies Plaintiff’s request for fee waiver as moot and grants Plaintiff’s request for service of the amended complaint by the U.S. Marshal. On February 4, 2022, Plaintiff filed a complaint and an accompanying motion to proceed IFP. Dkts. 1–2. On July 8, 2022, however, Plaintiff paid the filing fee in this action. Dkt. 6. On September 8, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration renewing his IFP request and, several weeks later, filed an amended complaint. Dkts. 15, 21. The Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion is sufficient…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.