Flores

Flores v. Austin

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20223:20-cv-00656California796 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Flores et al., Case No.: 20cv656-JO-DEB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE

v. MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION AND

Austin et al.,

ORDERING PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW

Defendants. CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT

BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

17 18 19 On March 23, 2022, the Court granted motions to dismiss Defendants Judge Joel R. Wohlfeil, Michael Weinstein, Scott H. Toothacre, Elyssa Kulas, Rachel M. Prendergast, and Ferris & Britton, APC from this action with prejudice on grounds of judicial immunity and Noerr-Pennington immunity. Dkt. 39 (“Dismissal Order”). The Court dismissed the First Amended Complaint against the remaining defendants in this action without prejudice for lack of standing and granted Plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint by May 11, 2022. Id. Since the March 23, 2022 Dismissal Order, Plaintiffs have neither complied with the Court’s order to file their amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.