Jayashankar

Kimera Labs Inc v. Jayashankar

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20223:21-cv-02137California7,215 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 KIMERA LABS INC., Case No.: 21-cv-2137-MMA (DDL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

RAJ JAYASHANKAR, et al.,

Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 40, 41] 17 18 Plaintiff Kimera Labs Inc. (“Plaintiff”) brings this lawsuit against Defendants Raj Jayashankar (“Jayashankar”), Exocel Bio Inc. (“Exocel”), Alejandro Contreras (“Contreras”), Deb Hubers (“Hubers”), and Craig Evan Winkels (“Winkels”) (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging misappropriation of Plaintiff’s trade secrets, civil conspiracy to commit tortious interference with business relations, tortious interference with business relations, unjust enrichment, and unfair competition. See Doc. No. 31. On June 6, 2022, Defendants Jayashankar, Exocel, Contreras, and Hubers filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.