Strojnik

Strojnik v. Carte Hotel Ventures, LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20223:22-cv-01088California1,625 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER STROJNIK, Case No.: 22-CV-1088 TWR (AGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE STATE LAW CLAIMS

AGAINST THE HOTEL

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, through Rob

Bonta in his official capacity as the (ECF No. 6) Attorney General of the State of California; CARTÉ HOTEL VENTURES,

LP,

17 Defendants.

On September 12, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff Peter Strojnik to show cause “why his state law claims against [Defendant Carté Hotel Ventures, LP (“the Hotel”)] should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.” (See ECF No. 5 (“OSC”) at 4.) Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Response to Order to Show Cause ECF 5 Why State Law Causes of Action Should [N]ot Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Resp.,” ECF No. 6). Plaintiff declined to file a further amended complaint. (See generally Docket.) As the Court previously explained …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.