Strojnik
Strojnik v. Carte Hotel Ventures, LP
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER STROJNIK, Case No.: 22-CV-1088 TWR (AGS)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE STATE LAW CLAIMS
AGAINST THE HOTEL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, through Rob
Bonta in his official capacity as the (ECF No. 6) Attorney General of the State of California; CARTÉ HOTEL VENTURES,
LP,
17 Defendants.
On September 12, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff Peter Strojnik to show cause “why his state law claims against [Defendant Carté Hotel Ventures, LP (“the Hotel”)] should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.” (See ECF No. 5 (“OSC”) at 4.) Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Response to Order to Show Cause ECF 5 Why State Law Causes of Action Should [N]ot Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Resp.,” ECF No. 6). Plaintiff declined to file a further amended complaint. (See generally Docket.) As the Court previously explained …