Lindland
Lindland v. TuSimple, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN LINDLAND, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00417-RBM-MDD
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF
v. JOHN LINDLAND’S MOTION TO
EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF
TUSIMPLE, INC., et al.,
DEFENDANT’S EXPERT WITNESS
Defendants. RICHARD HOLSTROM
16 [Doc. 32] 17 On March 24, 2022, Plaintiff John Lindland (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion to exclude the testimony of Defendant TuSimple, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) expert witness Richard Holstrom under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (“Motion”). (Doc. 32 (hereinafter “Mot.”).) Defendant filed a brief in opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion on April 21, 2022 (Doc. 44 (hereinafter “Opp.”)), and Plaintiff filed his reply on April 28, 2022. (Doc. 45.) For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND The Court thoroughly recounted the factual and procedural background of this action in its orders on Defendant’s motion for order…