Lindland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN LINDLAND, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00417-RBM-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

v. TUSIMPLE, INC.’S MOTION TO

EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF

TUSIMPLE, INC., et al.,

HORACIO VALEIRAS

Defendants. [Doc. 38] 16 17 On March 28, 2022, Defendant TuSimple, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a motion to exclude the testimony of Plaintiff John Lindland’s (“Plaintiff”) expert witness Horacio Valeiras under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (“Motion”). (Doc. 38 (hereinafter “Mot.”).) Plaintiff filed a brief in opposition to Defendant’s Motion on April 21, 2022 (Doc. 43 (hereinafter “Opp.”)), and Defendant filed its reply on April 28, 2022. (Doc. 46.) For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND The Court recounted the factual and procedural background of this action in its orders on Defendant’s motion for order for choice of law determination …