Phelps

Phelps v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20223:22-cv-01577California731 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYIESHA DAYANI PHELPS, Case No.: 22-CV-1577-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16

18 Myiesha Dayani Phelps (“Plaintiff”) files for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the Complaint. (Doc. No. 2.) The Court reviews Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), as required when a litigant files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP Motion”). The Court finds that the Complaint sufficiently states a claim for relief, and that Plaintiff has adequately shown an inability to pay the filing fee. Thus, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP Motion. I. MOTION FOR IFP Plaintiff moves to proceed IFP under 28 U.S.C. section 1915. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.