Lee v. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20223:22-cv-00176California2,729 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KELLY CHUNG LEE, Case No.: 22-CV-176 TWR (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO

DISMISS, AND (2) DISMISSING

MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

General, U.S. Department of Justice; et PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT al.,

16 Defendants. (ECF No. 9)

Presently before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.,” ECF No. 9) Plaintiff Kelly Chung Lee’s Complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) filed by Defendants Merrick Garland, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”); Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”); Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Director, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (“USCIS”); and Madeline Kristoff, Director, San Diego Field Office, USCIS. Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the Motion, (see generally Docket); however, Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.