Roberts

Roberts v. Olson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20223:22-cv-01373California2,228 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, Case No.: 22-CV-1373 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

CARI OLSON and MATT MILLES,

AND (2) DISMISSING WITHOUT

Defendants. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT

17 (ECF No. 1, 2, 5) 18 19 20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Tina Louise Roberts’ Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1) and Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF Nos. 2, 5). Plaintiff appears to assert that Defendants Matt Milles and Cari Olson (collectively, “Defendants”) removed money from Plaintiff’s bank account without authorization and that she was assaulted by one or more of Defendants. See generally Compl. Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s Complaint, her IFP Motions, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP Motions and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Complaint for the reasons that follow. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.