Bennett

Mitchell v. Bennett

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20223:22-cv-01011California4,039 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENYATTA QUINN MITCHELL Case No.: 3:22-cv-01011-DMS-RBB

CDCR # BC0837,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

[Doc. No. 2]; PAUL BENNETT, Supervising Parole 16 Officer, Chula Vista Parole Office; JANE (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT DOE, Parole Officer, Chula Vista Parole PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) Office, Defendants. AND § 1915A(b)(1);

(3) DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED

20 COMPLAINT [ECF No. 5] AS MOOT;

22 (4) DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL [ECF No. 6] 24 Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell (“Plaintiff” or “Mitchell”), an inmate currently incarcerated at the San Diego County Jail (“SDCJ”), filed a Complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), on July 12, 2022.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.