Norte

Colony Insurance Company v. Norte

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20223:22-cv-00068California1,860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No.: 22-cv-68-GPC-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO SET ASIDE ENTRY

OF DEFAULT AND DENYING AS

MICHELLE CHRISTIANA NORTE dba

MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

BEAUTY13,

DEFAULT JUDGMENT Defendant. 16 [ECF Nos. 26, 29] 17 INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff Colony Insurance Company’s (“Plaintiff” or “Colony”) Motion for Default Judgment, (ECF No. 26), and Defendant Michelle Christiana Norte’s (“Defendant” or “Norte”) Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default, (ECF No. 29). For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default and DENIES as MOOT Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. The hearing set for November 4, 2022 is VACATED. Defendant is directed to file a response to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before Friday, December 2, 2022. 26 27 BACKGROUND 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.