Walker

Walker v. Stryker Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20223:22-cv-00264California1,759 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE WALKER, an individual, Case No.: 22-cv-264-MMA-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S

STRYKER CORPORATION, a

CONTINUED DEPOSITION

Michigan corporation; STRYKER

EMPLOYMENT COMPANY, LLC,

a Michigan limited liability [Dkt. No. 52] company; and DOES 1 to 20, 17 inclusive, 18 Defendants.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Continued Deposition (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 52. Plaintiff opposes (“Opposition”). Dkt. No. 55. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff has sued Defendants, his former employers, for failure to pay commission, breach of contract, and other labor code violations. See generally Dkt. No. 23. Discovery has been underway since the entry of a Scheduling Order /// on April 18, 2022, by the Honorable Jill L. Burkhardt,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.