Parks

Parks v. Ethicon, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20223:20-cv-00989California2,512 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONNA PARKS, Case No.: 20cv989-LL-RBB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL

SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ISSUE

ETHICON, INC.;

PRECLUSION

JOHNSON & JOHNSON,

15 Defendants. [ECF No. 219]

17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Issue Preclusion [ECF No. 219 (“Motion” or “Mot.”)], Defendants’ Corrected Opposition [ECF No. 223 (“Opposition” or “Oppo.”)], and Plaintiffs’ Reply [ECF No. 225 (“Reply”)]. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this lawsuit in 2014 as part of a large multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) action before the Honorable Joseph R. Goodwin in the Southern District of West Virginia asserting medical products liability. ECF No. 1; In re Ethicon, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2327 (S.D. W. Va.). The action stems from the surgical implantation of Defendants’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.