Stafford

Stafford v. Rite Aid Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20223:17-cv-01340California2,158 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRYON STAFFORD, individually and on Lead Case No.: 17-CV-1340 TWR (JLB) behalf of all others similarly situated, (consolidated with No. 18-CV-152 TWR 12 (JLB)) Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER (1) VACATING HEARING,

AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’

RITE AID CORPORATION,

MOTION TO STAY Defendant. 16 (ECF No. 230) 17 18 Presently before the Court is the Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Ninth Circuit Appeal in Washington v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., No. 21-16162 (9th Cir. filed July 12, 2021) (the “Washington appeal”) (“Mot.,” ECF No. 230), filed by Defendants Rite Aid Corporation and Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., as well as Plaintiffs Bryon Stafford and Robert Josten’s Response in Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 233), Defendants’ Reply in Support of the Motion (“Reply,” ECF No. 238), and Plaintiffs’ Notice of Supplemental Authority. (See ECF No. 237-1 (Order, County of Monmouth v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 20-cv-2024 (E.D. Pa. filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.