Filippone

Filippone v. Thryv, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20223:22-cv-00017California2,967 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 ANTHONY FILIPPONE, et al., Case No.: 22-cv-00017-DMS-JLB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT THRYV,

v. INC.’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE

TESTIMONY FROM DR. MOON

THRYV, INC.,

AND PLAINTIFFS’ NON-RETAINED

Defendant. EXPERTS

18 [ECF No. 32] 19 Before the Court is a Motion to Exclude Testimony from Dr. Moon and Plaintiffs’ Non-Retained Experts filed by Defendant Thryv Inc. (“Defendant”). (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiffs Anthony Filippone and Giovanni Filippone (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) oppose the motion. (ECF No. 35.) This motion has been referred to the undersigned judge to determine in the first instance whether Plaintiffs’ expert disclosures violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that Plaintiffs’ expert disclosures violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. /// /// I. BACKGROUND The initial Scheduling Order issued in this case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.