Bennett
Bennett v. Cielo Homeowners Association, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAMELA BENNETT and JAMES Case No.: 22-cv-01426-WQH-BLM
BENNETT,
ORDER
Plaintiffs, 13 v.
CIELO HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC., THE JUDGE
LAW FIRM, JAMES JUDGE, and DOES 1-10, 17 Defendants. 18 HAYES, Judge: The matters before the Court are (1) the Request for Entry of Default (ECF No. 7) filed by Plaintiffs Pamela Bennett and James Bennett and (2) the Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint (ECF No.10) filed by Defendant Cielo Homeowners Association (“Defendant Cielo”). I. BACKGROUND On September 21, 2022, Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint against Defendants Cielo Homeowners Association, Inc., The Judge Law Firm, and James Judge, bringing claims concerning a foreclosure lien. Plaintiffs request entry of default as to 28 Defendant Cielo, claiming at least twenty-one days have passed since the Summons and Complaint were served on Defendant Cielo. (ECF No. 7 at 2–3.) On October 24, 2022, Defendant Cielo filed an Ex Parte…