Hurst

Hurst v. Richardson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20223:22-cv-01467California1,256 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK DORIAN HURST, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01467-GPC-MDD Booking #22722552,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. PURSUANT TO 14 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) ZACHARY RICHARDSON, San Diego 15 Police Officer #1065, [ECF No. 3] Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Patrick Dorian Hurst, proceeding pro se while detained at the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department Las Colinas Detention and Reentry Facility in Santee, California, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 26, 2022. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaintiff claims a San Diego Police Officer violated his constitutional rights during an April 2022 traffic stop that resulted in his arrest. Id. at 2‒5. He seeks injunctive relief preventing further harassment, $200 million in general and punitive damages, and demands a jury trial. Id. at 7. I. Procedural History On October 4, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.