Salmen

Salmen v. Bryant

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20223:22-cv-01508California2,906 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN SALMEN, Case No. 22-cv-1508-BAS-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO BRYANT, Correctional Officer; SAENZ,

PROCEED IN FORMA

Correctional Officer PAUPERIS (ECF No. 2); AND Defendants. 16 (2) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO

EFFECT SERVICE OF

COMPLAINT AND SUMMONS

PURSUANT TO

19 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3)

Plaintiff Justin Salmen (“Salmen” or “Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, commenced the instant prisoners’ civil rights lawsuit on October 5, 2022, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Salmen, who is currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), alleges that RJD Correctional Officers Bryant and Saenz (collectively “Defendants”) violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to take 28 reasonable measures to protect him from other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.