Beeman

Beeman v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20223:21-cv-00457California2,886 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANE BEEMAN, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00457-RBM-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILE SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

Defendants. [Doc. 67] 16 Currently pending before the Court is a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (“SAC”) filed by Plaintiff Shane Beeman (“Plaintiff”), who is appearing pro se. (Doc. 67 (hereinafter “Motion” or “Mot.”).) Defendants City of San Diego, the San Diego Police Department, and Dave Gibson (“Defendants”) filed a brief in opposition on October 3, 2022 (Doc. 70 (hereinafter “Opp.”), and Plaintiff filed a reply on October 17, 2022 (Doc. 71). The Court finds the matter suitable for determination without oral argument in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the instant action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.