Schneider

Schneider v. Molina

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20223:22-cv-01666California673 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 JULIE C. SCHNEIDER, Case No.: 22-cv-1666-CAB-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING APPLICATION

v. FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND DENYING

ALICIA MOLINA; LAW OFFICES OF

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

MOLINA & MOLINA; AMERISAVE;

ORDER AND MOTION FOR

FREEDOM MORTGAGE

DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS MOOT

CORPORATION; NESTOR TRUSTEE

SERVICES; AND SUPREME

[Doc. Nos. 2, 3, 4]

LENDING,

12 Defendants.

14 On October 27, 2022, Plaintiff Julie Schneider filed a Complaint [Doc. No. 1], a 15 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [Doc. No. 3], and a Motion for Default 16 Judgment [Doc. No. 4] against various Defendants. Each filing is related to Defendants’ 17 standing to foreclose on property located at 9272 Brookside Circle, Spring Valley, 18 California 91977 (“the Property”). Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fees required by 19 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing; instead, she filed a Motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.