Schneider
Schneider v. Molina
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20223:22-cv-01666California673 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 JULIE C. SCHNEIDER, Case No.: 22-cv-1666-CAB-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION
v. FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS AND DENYING
ALICIA MOLINA; LAW OFFICES OF
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
MOLINA & MOLINA; AMERISAVE;
ORDER AND MOTION FOR
FREEDOM MORTGAGE
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS MOOT
CORPORATION; NESTOR TRUSTEE
SERVICES; AND SUPREME
[Doc. Nos. 2, 3, 4]
LENDING,
12 Defendants.
14 On October 27, 2022, Plaintiff Julie Schneider filed a Complaint [Doc. No. 1], a 15 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [Doc. No. 3], and a Motion for Default 16 Judgment [Doc. No. 4] against various Defendants. Each filing is related to Defendants’ 17 standing to foreclose on property located at 9272 Brookside Circle, Spring Valley, 18 California 91977 (“the Property”). Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fees required by 19 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing; instead, she filed a Motion to…