Frazier
Richardson v. Frazier
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN RICHARDSON, Case No.: 22-CV-1447 TWR (AHG)
Petitioner,
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FRAZIER, Warden, Respondent.
On September 22, 2022, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Pet.,” ECF No. 1). On September 28, 2022, the Court issued an Order dismissing the case without prejudice because Petitioner had failed to satisfy the filing fee requirement. (See generally ECF No. 2.) In its Order, the Court notified Petitioner that to have his case reopened, he must either pay the filing fee or provide adequate proof of his inability to pay no later than November 10, 2022. (See id. at 1–2.) On October 14, 2022, Petitioner paid the $5.00 filing fee and the case was reopened. (See ECF No. 3.) The Petition must be dismissed, however, because Petitioner has failed to state a cognizable claim. …