Ramirez Rojas v. Barnard Contruction
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARGARITO RAMIREZ ROJAS, an Case No.: 22-cv-00533-AJB-KSC individual, on behalf of himself, and on 12 behalf of all persons similarly situated, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND Plaintiff,
v. (Doc. No. 6)
16 BARNARD CONSTRUCTION,1 a Montana corporation; BARNARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a 18 Montana corporation; and Does 1 through 100, Inclusive,
20 Defendants. 21 Before the Court is Margarito Ramirez Rojas’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for remand. (Doc. No. 6.) Barnard Construction Company, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a response to Plaintiff’s motion, to which Plaintiff replied. (Doc. Nos. 10, 11.) Having considered the 25 26 1 The Notice of Removal contains a spelling of this company’s name that is different from that used in the Complaint and First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). As the spelling in the Notice of Removal appears to be a typographical error, the Court uses the spelling used in the complaints. (Compare Doc. No. 1 at 1 28 1…