Crouch

Crouch v. Ruby Corp

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20223:22-cv-00711California7,812 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HARRY CROUCH, on behalf of himself Case No. 22-cv-711-MMA (JLB) and all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS; AND v. 14 [Doc. No. 12] RUBY CORP., et al., 15 Defendants. DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

TO STRIKE AS MOOT

17 [Doc. No. 13] 18 19 20 On May 18, 2022, Plaintiff Harry Crouch filed a putative class action complaint against Defendants Ruby Corp and Ruby Life, Inc. (“Defendants”). See Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Defendants now move to dismiss the Complaint, see Doc. No. 12, and strike Plaintiff’s class allegations, see Doc. No. 13. Both motions are fully briefed, see Doc. Nos. 14–18, and the Court took the matters under submission and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, see Doc. No.19. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss and DENIES Defendants’ motion to strike as moot. I. BACKGROUND Defendants Ruby Corp and Ruby Life are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.