Martins

Martins v. New West Investment Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20223:18-cv-01731-AJB-AHGCalifornia2,471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN MARTINS, Case No.: 3:18-cv-01731-AJB-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER SUA SPONTE AMENDING

SCHEDULING ORDER

v. JACKIE JOSEPHSON and

JAY KNOHL,

15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 This matter comes before the Court upon a review of the docket and after lengthy 26 conferences with the parties. For the reasons set forth below, the Court sua sponte amends 27 the Scheduling Order. 28 I. BACKGROUND On May 27, 2021, the Court issued its Scheduling Order, which required any dispositive motions to be filed by February 10, 2022. ECF No. 145 at 3. Neither party filed any dispositive motions by the deadline. In its May 27, 2021, Scheduling Order, the Court also set the pretrial conference for June 23, 2022, requiring the parties to file their pretrial disclosures by May 26, 2022, and lodge their joint proposed pretrial order by June 16, 2022. Id. at 4. On June 2, 2022, since neither party had complied with their pretrial disclosure requirements, Judge Battaglia sua…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.